In situations of doubt regarding the Labor Code, which entity should the resolution favor?

The principle that resolution should favor labor in situations of doubt regarding the Labor Code is rooted in the concept of protecting workers' rights and welfare. Labor laws are typically designed to safeguard employees against potential exploitation and ensure fair treatment in the workplace.

When there is ambiguity in the law, favoring labor aligns with the intent of labor legislation, which prioritizes the protection of the more vulnerable party in the employer-employee relationship. This approach promotes fairness and acknowledges the inherent power imbalance that often exists between employers and employees. By interpreting doubtful provisions in favor of labor, the legal framework seeks to uphold the dignity and rights of workers, ensuring they receive the benefits and protections legally granted to them.

The other entities—employers, government, and judiciary—while significant in their roles, do not carry the same prioritization within labor law interpretations. Employers typically seek to minimize obligations and costs, while government and judiciary roles revolve around upholding the law and maintaining order rather than directly serving the interests of labor. This principle underscores a commitment to social justice and equity within the labor market.