If the grievance procedure fails in a dispute over wage distortion, what is the next step?

In the context of a grievance procedure failing to resolve a dispute over wage distortion, voluntary arbitration is the next logical step. This process typically involves an impartial third party who listens to both sides of the dispute and makes a binding decision on the matter.

Voluntary arbitration is often viewed as a constructive avenue to settle disputes without resorting to formal legal action. It provides a structured environment where both parties can present their positions, facilitating a resolution while maintaining confidentiality and reducing the adversarial nature that often accompanies other options such as litigation.

In scenarios involving wage issues, voluntary arbitration can be particularly effective as it may encourage problem-solving approaches, allowing both the employer and employees or their representatives to articulate their concerns and seek a mutually acceptable resolution. This method also strengthens labor-management relations by demonstrating a willingness to engage in peaceful resolution processes rather than escalating conflicts to more contentious methods.

Other options like negotiation or union intervention could happen before a grievance procedure or even concurrently, but once grievances are formally lodged and procedural avenues are exhausted, arbitration stands as a highly recommended step to ensure fair outcomes. Litigation, while a possible step, represents a more extreme measure and often entails significant costs and time, making it a less favorable choice compared to voluntary arbitration.